Wednesday, September 10, 2008

It's the economy, stupid.

Unemployment is at an all-time high. Not all of it is Bush's fault, but his failure to put the American People above his rich oil buddies has seriously hurt this country.

What do our two candidates propose? Let's compare, shall we?

  • supports lowering taxes to help small businesses (good, good)
  • would cut the corporate tax rate from 35% to 25% (um, why?)
  • supports giving tax breaks to businesses for investing in equipment and technology (could you be more specific as to what kind of equipment? but good)
  • wants to establish a permanent tax credit for research and development (huh? sounds ok, but needs more research)

  • supports tax incentives for companies that keep jobs in the US (good, good)
  • believes that the NAFTA agreement should be renegotiated to the protect the American economy. (I'll go with that, how old is that thing?)
  • suggests a $75 billion plan for the economy would offer a $500 tax rebate to families and a $250 Social Security supplement to seniors (arrgh! NO! forget the rebate, the supplement sounds good, our seniors on fixed incomes need all the help they can get)
  • would put more money into unemployment insurance (sounds good, but how?)
  • would give federal money to states hardest hit by the housing crisis. (good)
  • would stop mortgage fraud and predatory lending with legislation that he proposed two years ago (GOOD!)
Okay, so both have their pros and cons, but overall, not bad, right?

Just weeks before the government's fiscal year ends Sept. 30, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office on Tuesday projected a near-record federal budget deficit of $407 billion, sharply higher than White House projections six weeks ago and more than double last year's figure.

Mammoth federal-budget deficits feed inflation, make America dependent on foreign lenders, cost taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars in interest payments on the growing national debt and drain capital savings from more productive investments.

The widening gap between what the government spends and the revenue it brings in is sure to weigh on the next president and impede his efforts to spend on new or larger programs or to cut taxes.

Yet John McCain and Barack Obama show few signs that they're ready to take tough steps to curb deficits, according to budget analysts.

"I don't think either candidate is treating the deficit, or the debt, seriously. And I don't see any proposals from either one that would make the situation any better," said Robert Bixby, the executive director of the Concord Coalition, a bipartisan budget-watchdog organization.

Maya MacGuineas, the president of the bipartisan Center for a Responsible Federal Budget, said in a statement that both candidates "are promising hundreds of billions more in spending and tax cuts than they are paying for."

Republican nominee McCain has promised to balance the budget by 2013, but most analysts consider that goal elusive unless lawmakers make radical changes in Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid funding. McCain has made no such dramatic proposals.

Obama issued a statement Tuesday on the new data, promising that he'd "bring real change by cutting taxes for middle-class families and small businesses, paying for all his proposals to reduce the deficit" and working toward fiscal responsibility. He'd let tax cuts for the wealthiest earners expire and would impose higher taxes on certain corporations.

However, the Brookings Institution-Urban Institute Tax Policy Center has found that Obama's tax-reduction plan would increase the national debt by $3.5 trillion by 2018. McCain wants to leave existing tax cuts in place rather than let them expire, which the center said would add $5 trillion to the debt.

The CBO also offered a dismal forecast Tuesday, projecting a record deficit of $438 billion in the coming year due to the slowing economy, which would reduce tax receipts to the Treasury.


White House Press Secretary Dana Perino said that one big reason the deficit went up was the stimulus that President Bush signed into law in February. The CBO said that another large part of the deficit's unexpected growth came from rising unemployment-benefit payments and higher spending to cover insured deposits in insolvent financial institutions.

Another boost to the deficit came from Congress and Bush's appetite for discretionary spending, which is expected to rise by $85 billion, or 8.1 percent, in the current fiscal year, mostly because of higher defense costs.

The CBO projected that economic growth would slow to a 1.5 percent annual rate this calendar year and 1.1 percent next year. Even if the tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 expire as scheduled on Jan. 1, 2011, the deficit would be $325 billion the following year.

To bridge the gap between spending and tax revenues, the federal government borrows, increasing the national debt. It's grown from $5.7 trillion in 2000 to almost $9.7 trillion on Tuesday.

Analyst Bixby doubted that either presidential candidate's proposals would make a serious dent in the deficit and debt.

"Even if both of them can pay for their new initiatives and not make the situation any worse, the situation is unsustainable," he said. "Simply treading water is not good enough if you are headed over the falls."

FUCK! And who says we're not in a recession?!

*goes off to look for a job to help the family budget*


emawkc said...

$500 Tax rebate? Isn't that what Bush did? Who is the candidate of change?

"The D" said...

McCain would double the child tax credit from $3500 to $7000 PER CHILD. That's a 14,000 dollar tax credit to you.

Janet said...

That wasn't the point, Darren.

The point is that while both candidates have great plans on paper, nothing that EITHER one of them do is going to help our economy, not McCain, and not Obama.

This is NOT a pro-Obama post!

I want someone who can LOWER our national debt! And our taxes are going to go up, no matter who gets elected. Just like when Bush Senior was elected after all of his "no new taxes" promises during his campaign.

I try to live in this place called Reality. It sucks many days...

Janet said...

btw, where did you see that information about the child tax credit? I haven't seen it on any of the non-bashing political sites.

You'd think that'd be something they would use to compare, really.

"The D" said...

He said it during the RNC and other speeches since then.

Try his web site.